AMD Ryzen 7 5700G 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics

CPU works well. No crashing or thermal throttling. And the integrated graphics are great as a backup in case you have a faulty graphics card or need to troubleshoot something. Just be aware that this CPU only supports up to PCIE 3.0.

No issues, I received what I ordered, and all is working fine. Was a fully sealed unused item, works great and have had no issues at all so far. Thank you.

Excelente producto de la marca AMD Ryzen.

8 Núcleos a mas de 3.6GHz por un precio bastante económico, perfecto para poder jugar a juegos de hoy en día y realizar tareas multi-thread.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a high-performance processor that offers impressive specifications and capabilities. In this extensive review, we will delve into the processor’s architecture, performance, integrated graphics, power efficiency, and overall value for users seeking a powerful CPU for their computing needs.

Architecture:
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is based on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring a 7nm manufacturing process and a chiplet design that enables efficient performance and power management. The processor incorporates an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, with a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz and a boost clock speed of up to 4.6 GHz, delivering exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance.

Performance:
With its multi-core prowess and high clock speeds, the Ryzen 7 5700G excels in demanding workloads, such as content creation, video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The processor’s Zen 3 architecture enhances instructions per clock (IPC) performance, resulting in snappy and efficient operation across a wide range of applications.

Integrated Graphics:
One of the standout features of the Ryzen 7 5700G is its integrated Radeon graphics based on the Vega architecture. The processor includes 8 compute units (CUs) running at up to 2.0 GHz, providing capable integrated graphics performance for casual gaming, multimedia tasks, and light content creation without the need for a dedicated graphics card.

Power Efficiency:
The Ryzen 7 5700G showcases remarkable power efficiency, thanks to its 7nm process and refined architecture. The processor’s power management allows for efficient utilization of resources, contributing to lower power consumption and heat output, making it an excellent choice for small form factor builds and energy-conscious users.

Overall Value:
From a value perspective, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G offers a compelling proposition for users who prioritize both strong CPU and integrated GPU performance. Its versatility makes it an ideal choice for budget-friendly gaming rigs, home theater PCs, and productivity-focused systems where space and power constraints are factors to consider.

In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G impresses with its Zen 3 architecture, robust multi-threaded performance, capable integrated Radeon graphics, power efficiency, and overall value for users looking for a well-rounded processor with integrated graphics capabilities.

If you have any further questions or need additional details about the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, feel free to ask!

– INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND iGPU IMPRESSION

This is actually an OUTSTANDING Cpu. I bought it for building a test-bench with “OpenBenchTable” (you can look it up on youtube, they’re pretty sweet), and I figured it might be a good idea to have integrated graphics built-in. Boy, was I right. A video card that worked perfectly well with my other system (which I’m still using) for some reason would not participate in video output, even though its fans were spinning. As a matter of fact, if it weren’t for this iGPU, I probably wouldn’t have even been able to build my system. Once I got everything running and setup however, for some reason the video card I was just talking about suddenly started working (and it’s not a matter of drivers because we’re including the BIOS display here too).

However – what I came to realize, to my great dismay and simultaneous delight, was that the built-in AMD Radeon graphics on this chip actually look BETTER than the mid-tier GTX 10-series that eventually started working. There was a washed-out and overly exposed character to the Nvidia graphics, while the Radeon built-ins came right out of the box looking rich, properly contrasted and – for lack of a better term – THICC… (plus, AMD’s display management software beats Nvidia’s any day, and this comes from a daily Nvidia driver)

– IGPU PERFORMANCE (emulation gaming)

Ok, so I didn’t build this test-bench for AAA gaming purposes. But I do like me some emulation, and I figured the G in “5700G” must have stood for “O.G.” So I threw on a PS2 emulator (PCSX2) and here are my very un-scientific results.

Gran Turismo 3 was a little too stuttery at 2K (4x original resolution), though less than I thought; 4K was a no-go, though the system tried (6x original); and 1080p was ABSOLUTELY playable (3x original), and I plan to do it again sometime with a friend. You’d probably get the best outcome from 720, but I’m a little snobbish about my emulation standards.

The entire CPU package itself got to 52° also, for what that’s worth, and the graphics processing ramped-up to 2000mHz. All-in-all, not bad for what you get especially considering how much emulators rely on V-ram (which there isn’t much of here).

– CPU IMPRESSION

As for the CPU itself, I’m equally impressed. I was ABOUT to click “buy” on the 5950X, since it seems to be the top of the line that AM4 will support as I went with a B550 motherboard instead of B650 for compatibility purposes (afterall, “testbench” remember?). I figured “well, it’s open-air, maybe I can get away with non-liquid cooling despite the 5950x’s product recommendation;” but then I realized I wouldn’t have had a grahpics backup, and as I mentioned, this would have been a disaster for not only my system setup, but also my wallet! So now not only am I saving on money and space, but I’m also saving on power as well. Win, win, win.

– CPU/TEMP PERFORMANCE (non-gaming)

Performance-wise, so far I’ve experienced no lagginess or lack of processing throughput thus far. It sticks around 4,000 mhz at any given time for basic tasks (3.7ghz to 4.5d), and alternates between low 30’s to low 40’s celsius.
During non-overclocked performance testing (with Gigabyte autotune turned on) using Prime95, it hovered around 59-60° during a three minute “blend” test – but surprisingly, with “small FFT torture” it actually stuck around 55° instead. Only with CPU-Z multi-core stress testing did it get anywhere near 70° (and remember, this is with an open benchtable setup), so I’m really not worried about the temps – though I have no doubt their lower baseline due to this setup is probably contributing to its performance somewhat.

Ambient temp of ~78° throughout.

NOTE: This is with a bequiet! Pure Rock 2 FX, which looks really “benchin’” on my rig as well (see photo), and I’m sure is helping with those temperatures more than the included wraith cooler (which is still nice to have on hand as a backup). I also used Noctua NT-H1 grease this time, which seems to perform 1° better against Arctic’s MX-4 based on previous tests I did with my other system.

– OPERATING SYSTEMS

I forgot to mention, the operating systems I’ve deployed thus-far on this system have been:

Windows 10
Fedora Linux
and
“Haiku” OS

(yes, actually that)

ALL of these have been completely functional right out-of-the-box, without the need for installing additional drivers. I only added the drivers for Windows 10 because I wanted the RADEON graphics management software, and also just to see what it would do. You could honestly live without them if you wanted because the hardware is simply so universally compatible. Giant plus there, especially for a workbench station.

GIANT plus on AMD’s part for making dedicated software for multiple Linux distributions as well.

– TAKEAWAY

After this experience, I’m seriously considering looking into Radeon for any graphical expansions I might want to do with this board. I didn’t expect its initial output to be so utterly solid. My only concern would be size in that case, since this is a Micro-ATX that I’m working with and it seems a long GPU would actually cover the SATA ports. But I need to stop overdoing it with my drives so much anyway XD

– BOTTOM-LINE

If you’re looking for something rock-solid for that lingering AM4 seat that can be relied upon under any conditions and you don’t want to spend a fortune, you CAN’T go wrong with this chip. Well worth the price, and well performing for the price range.